Compare the Norco Sight and Trek Fuel EX trail mountain bikes. Detailed sizing, geometry, and handling analysis.
$5,500 - $8,000
$4,500 - $5,500
| Measurement | Norco Sight C1 | Trek Fuel EX 8 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size | S | M | L | XL | S | M | M/L | L | XL |
| Stack (mm) | 600 | 614 | 625 | 638 | 596 | 610 | 618 | 625 | 640 |
| Reach (mm) | 440 | 460 | 478 | 498 | 435 | 455 | 468 | 480 | 500 |
The Trek Fuel EX offers a unique M/L size between Medium and Large that fills a gap most brands miss—riders between 173-183cm will appreciate this option. The Norco Sight runs about 5mm longer in reach per equivalent size, reflecting its more aggressive trail orientation. If you're between sizes on the Norco, size down for agility; on the Trek, the M/L may be your perfect fit.
The Norco Sight and Trek Fuel EX are both outstanding trail bikes, but they target slightly different ends of the trail spectrum. The Sight's extra 10mm of rear travel and more aggressive geometry make it the better choice for riders who prioritize descending performance and ride chunky terrain regularly. The Fuel EX's Mino Link adjustability, lighter frame, and five-size range make it more versatile—equally at home on XC-style trails as it is on technical descents. The Trek's global dealer network is also a significant advantage for riders who travel with their bikes.
Trek Fuel EX - slightly more upright geometry and Mino Link adjustability
Norco Sight - more travel and aggressive geometry for pushing descents
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate of other retailers, we earn from qualifying purchases. This helps support our free calculators.